In 2001, a term to characterize this period was proposed by Marc
Prensky (2001a, 2001b), who called them “Digital
Natives”, because he noticed they are to be “native
speakers” of the digital language of computers and the Internet. According to
Prensky (2001a), Digital Natives were different from earlier peiods, whom he described
as Digital Immigrants, and they had established new mindset, competences, and accesses to
learning. Prensky characterised the whole period with the change
and proposed that the new generation comprehended contrastingly and that this revolution
had been caused by a growth of technological development. In his second article
Prensky (2001b) also declared that the brains of Digital Natives were physically
contrast to those of earlier generations because of the explicit impacts of
digital technologies. In opposition to Digital Natives,
those who were not born in the digital period and had embraced many of the new
technologies later in life, were named the “Digital
Immigrants” (Prensky, 2001a). On the contrary to Digital Natives, Digital
Immigrants had to learn and adapt to using rising technologies rather than
seeing them as natural tools as part of their world. According to Prensky, no
matter how well Digital Immigrants adjusted to the new condition, they would cling
to their digital immigrant significance. Prensky also shared a subject to be
discussed that is about the serious break he had analysed between Digital
Native students and the technological literacy of their Digital Immigrant
tutors, and he continued to demand that this generation break was “the
biggest single problem facing education today” (2001
p.2). The attributes and learning preferences of Digital Native students, he claimed,
were conflicting with the teaching practice of their teachers. As this group of
young people joined higher education, educators would require to adopt their
teaching practices in order to accommodate the demands of the new generation of
learners (Prensky, 2001a).
Two recent comments led me to
finally enter the 21st century. First, back to my first
year teaching at Norway in 2010. I was asked by my Principal to use the
smart board in my class. I told her that I did not have any experience in using
the smart board. That is why I had never used the smart board in my classroom. I
would prefer to use the ordinary white board in my teaching and learning
process. She
looked at me in an odd
and curious way (like she was talking to someone from another planet) and stated in a
matter of fact manner, “Tjandra, even your 5th graders could operate the smart board. You need to learn
from them.” I know
that she did not have any intention to humiliate me, but that struck me.
Second, I was chatting with my friends through Facebook when she asked me whether I
have a Blackberry or not. She told me that we could chat using the Blackberry
Messager. I told her that I did not have any Blackberry. I am using an Android phone. Then she asked me my WhatsApp. I
was a bit frustrated at that time when I heard that. It was because I did not
have any WhatsApp either. I thought that I could chat using my Android phone, or if I need
a bigger screen, I just used my laptop. That is why I did not want to use WhatsApp.
This concept of digital
native vs. digital immigrant causes a
great deal of awareness to me. Young people in our community are digital natives. They seem to be very
pleased with everything from iPhones to IPads. Digital immigrants, like
me, just never accept that good feeling with these technologies. Yes, we may
learn to adjust by using mobile phones, email,
Facebook, and so forth but it just does not and
perhaps will never be very natural for us. It is like studying a
second language you can use it orally but
with some problems. Perhaps we have a crucial time in our lives for technology,
similar to when
we do for language. When we are small, we catch the language so quickly but find
it so much challenging to learn a new language when we are adult. The same seems to be true
for technology.
So, I forced myself to keep up to date with the technology
development. I believe that technology has brought a huge impact in my life. In
the past, I used my phone only for calling or receiving a call and sending and
receiving text messages. Now, I use my phone to take pictures, listening to the
radio, check email, surf at the internet, Facebooking, chatting through Yahoo
Messager, checking the weather forecast, picture editing and many more. If
there is a problem which includes technology usage, I usually tend to search
the answer at the internet instead of asking help from my colleague. That is
because in my school, the IT person who deals with the hardware and software
stays in another building a bit far from our school. Only then, when I could
not find the answer at the internet, then I would call him asking for help.
So, what about
you? Are you a digital native or a digital immigrant and how does it impact
your life?
References
Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital
Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,
part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 6.
Plante, T. (2012, July 24). Digital
native vs. digital immigrant? which are you?. Retrieved from
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/do-the-right-thing/201207/digital-native-vs-digital-immigrant-which-are-you
No comments:
Post a Comment